Aramic Sweet Red Alabama vs RiiFFS Ambre Rouge
The Scent Atlas community has tested both. Here's how they stack up on performance, accuracy and value.
Comparison
| Aramic Sweet Red Alabama | RiiFFS Ambre Rouge | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 7.8/10 · 1 reviews | No rating |
| Longevity | 7.5/10 | No rating |
| Projection | 7.2/10 | No rating |
| Scent accuracy | 8.0/10 | No rating |
| Value for money | 8.5/10 | No rating |
| Price | £25 | No price |
| Concentration | EDP | EDP |
| Gender | Unisex | Feminine |
| Inspired by | Maison Francis Kurkdjian Baccarat Rouge 540 | Maison Francis Kurkdjian Baccarat Rouge 540 |
Notes Comparison
Compare the note structure of both fragrances and see which notes they share.
Aramic Sweet Red Alabama
Top Notes
- Jasmine
- Saffron
Heart Notes
- Amberwood
Base Notes
- Ambergris
- Fir Resin
- Cedarwood
RiiFFS Ambre Rouge
Top Notes
- Bitter Almond
- Saffron
Heart Notes
- White Jasmine
- Saffron
- Oriental Spices
- Roasted Nuts
Base Notes
- Honey Amber
- Precious Woods
- Musk
Shared Notes
- Saffron
1 shared note.
Quick verdict
- Longevity: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (7.5/10)
- Projection: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (7.2/10)
- Scent accuracy: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (8.0/10)
- Value for money: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (8.5/10)
- Price: Wins RiiFFS Ambre Rouge (£0)