Aramic Sweet Red Alabama vs Noted Aromas Monte Carlo
The Scent Atlas community has tested both. Here's how they stack up on performance, accuracy and value.
Both fragrances are inspired by Maison Francis Kurkdjian Baccarat Rouge 540.
Comparison
| Aramic Sweet Red Alabama | Noted Aromas Monte Carlo | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 7.8/10 · 1 review | 6.5/10 · 1 review |
| Longevity | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Projection | 7.2/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Scent accuracy | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Value for money | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Price | £25 | £20 |
| Concentration | EDP | EDP |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Inspired by | Maison Francis Kurkdjian Baccarat Rouge 540 | Maison Francis Kurkdjian Baccarat Rouge 540 |
Notes Comparison
Compare the note structure of both fragrances and see which notes they share.
Aramic Sweet Red Alabama
Top Notes
Heart Notes
Base Notes
Noted Aromas Monte Carlo
Top Notes
Heart Notes
Base Notes
Shared Notes
6 shared notes.
Quick verdict
- Longevity: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (7.5/10)
- Projection: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (7.2/10)
- Scent accuracy: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (8.0/10)
- Value for money: Wins Aramic Sweet Red Alabama (8.5/10)
- Price: Wins Noted Aromas Monte Carlo (£20)