Al Haramain Royal Musk vs Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White
The Scent Atlas community has tested both. Here's how they stack up on performance, accuracy and value.
Both fragrances are inspired by Xerjoff Erba Pura.


Comparison
| Al Haramain Royal Musk | Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White |
|---|
| Overall rating | 7.1/10 · 1 review | 8.0/10 · 1 review |
|---|
| Longevity | 6.8/10 | 7.5/10 |
|---|
| Projection | 6.2/10 | 6.5/10 |
|---|
| Scent accuracy | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
|---|
| Value for money | 7.8/10 | 9.0/10 |
|---|
| Price | £40 | £21 |
|---|
| Concentration | EDP | EDP |
|---|
| Gender | Masculine | Unisex |
|---|
| Inspired by | Xerjoff Erba Pura | Xerjoff Erba Pura |
|---|
Notes Comparison
Compare the note structure of both fragrances and see which notes they share.
Al Haramain Royal Musk
Top Notes
Heart Notes
Base Notes
Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White
Top Notes
Heart Notes
Base Notes
Shared Notes
2 shared notes.
Quick verdict
- Longevity: Wins Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White (7.5/10)
- Projection: Wins Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White (6.5/10)
- Scent accuracy: Wins Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White (8.5/10)
- Value for money: Wins Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White (9.0/10)
- Price: Wins Lattafa Ana Abiyedh Original White (£21)
See the full Royal Musk breakdown
See the full Ana Abiyedh Original White breakdown